Daniels v. McGuire
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco granting a new trial. John T. Nourse, Judge. ' The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtWaste, P. J.
Plaintiff brought this action to recover damages from the defendant on account of alleged malicious prosecution. He averred that he was wrongfully accused by the defendant of opening, secreting, and embezzling letters transmitted through the United States mail, in violation of certain federal statutes. Two trials with jury have been had. The first resulted in a disagreement. On the second trial, the present ease, the jury returned a verdict for the defendant. Plaintiff made a motion for a new trial, which was granted, and from which order the defendant appeals.
The motion for a new trial was…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Gordon v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Morgan v. Los Angeles Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1910
- Stone v. WolfeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hanlon Drydock & Shipbuilding Co. v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928