Legal Opinion
Litman v. George Mason University
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided February 26, 2001No. CA-97-1755-APublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
■ CACHERIS, District Judge.
Annette Litman brought suit against George Mason University under Title IX. Her Complaint alleges that the university should be held liable for sexual harassment and retaliation she suffered at the hands of two of her professors. The Court is presented with a novel question: whether a plaintiff alleging Title IX retaliation must show intentional discrimination and, if so, how she makes that showing. Defendants George Mason University and Gerard Mul-herin have filed a Motion for Summary Judgment; Defendant Eugene Morris has file a Motion to Dismiss…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Shaw v. StroudCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
- Davis Ex Rel. LaShonda D. v. Monroe County Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Frederick v. Simpson CollegeDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 2001
- Litman v. George Mason UniversityDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2001
- Snelling v. Fall Mtn. SchoolDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2001