Legal Opinion

Heenan v. Perkins

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1977No. 5630, SC P2508PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBryson, J.

Plaintiff Jack Heenan (Jack), by guardian ad litem, brought this action to recover for personal injuries sustained when the truck in which he was a passenger went out of control. The truck was owned by defendant Hamlin Perkins and was being driven at the time of the accident by his minor stepson, Matt Sheffield (Matt). Plaintiff sought to hold defendant Matt liable for gross negligence and defendant Perkins liable as principal under the family purpose doctrine. The jury returned a verdict against defendant Matt but in favor of defendant Perkins. Plaintiff appeals from that portion of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wiebe v. SeelyOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Foster v. FarraOregon Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Kraxberger v. RogersOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Hawes v. TaylorOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Redding v. BarkerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Young v. BeckArizona Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Fisher v. PippinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API