Legal Opinion

American Brake Shoe & Foundry Co. v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 31, 1945Published

1Opinion of the Court

HULBERT, District Judge.

The petitioners, Manhattan Railway Company and Charles Franklin, seek to impress a lien on alleged existing reserve funds created by the stockholders of Manhattan Railway Company, for legal services rendered to it and its stockholders by Franklin, in the amount of $310,000, or in the alternative, in an amount to be fixed and determined by this court, as the reasonable value thereof.

Petitioners also seek to impress a similar lien on unmortgaged real estate and other assets formerly belonging to the Manhattan Railway Company, which were turned over to the City of New…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. New York City v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. American Brake Shoe & Foundry Co. v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
  3. Murray v. RobertsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
  4. Palmer v. Guaranty Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
  5. American Brake Shoe & Foundry Co. v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API