American Brake Shoe & Foundry Co. v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
HULBERT, District Judge.
The petitioners, Manhattan Railway Company and Charles Franklin, seek to impress a lien on alleged existing reserve funds created by the stockholders of Manhattan Railway Company, for legal services rendered to it and its stockholders by Franklin, in the amount of $310,000, or in the alternative, in an amount to be fixed and determined by this court, as the reasonable value thereof.
Petitioners also seek to impress a similar lien on unmortgaged real estate and other assets formerly belonging to the Manhattan Railway Company, which were turned over to the City of New…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- New York City v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- American Brake Shoe & Foundry Co. v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
- Murray v. RobertsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
- Palmer v. Guaranty Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
- American Brake Shoe & Foundry Co. v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.