Margoles v. Saxe
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
HOLT, Justice.
Certiorm-i to review a decision of the industrial commission awarding respondent compensation for injuries sustained in an accidental explosion.
Two propositions are presented by relators, viz: (a) The record does not show that the relator Saxe was under the compensation act; (b) the evidence does not sustain the finding that respondent’s injuries were caused by an accident arising out of and in the course of the employment.
There is no conflict in the proof which shows that relator Saxe owns and operates a 22-acre farm on Lyndale avenue a short distance south of the city of…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Brusven v. BallordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Eaton v. Joe N. Miles & SonsMississippi Supreme Court · 1960
- Newlin v. Cordray Ford TractorMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990