Legal Opinion

Needelman v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 27, 1960No. 278PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

After hearing oral argument, and further study of the record, we conclude that the record does not adequately present the questions tendered in the petition. Accordingly the writ is dismissed as improvidently granted.

Mr. Justice Frankfurter, whom Mr. Justice Clark and Mr. Justice Harlan join.

Considering the volume of cases which invoke the Court's discretionary jurisdiction — as of today 1,091 such cases have been passed on during this Term — it would be indeed surprising if in each Term there were not two or three instances of petitions which, after passing through the preliminary sifting…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Joseph v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Triplett v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. Robinson Ramirez and Nicolas Farias SanchezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  2. Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corp. v. Underwriters Laboratories, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1978
  3. United States v. Marcus Wayne WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
  4. United States v. Donald Mark NathanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
  5. United States v. JarrieUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API