Legal Opinion
Crail v. Illinois Cent. R.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided October 18, 1924PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CANT, District Judge.
The amount immediately involved in this action is small. The action itself is said to be important, because the claim of plaintiff is one of a very numerous class.
In September, 1922, defendant engaged to transport a certain carload of coal, weighing 88,700 pounds, from a point in the state of Illinois to Minneapolis, Minn. Before its arrival at Minneapolis, plaintiff became the owner and consignee of the coal. On arrival in plaintiff’s yard at Minneapolis, the place of delivery, it was found that 5,500 pounds of the coal had been lost in transit. At that time the value of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co. v. McCaull CoSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. McCaull-Dinsmore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Harvey v. Connecticut & Passumpsic Rivers RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
- Yazoo & M. V. R. v. Delta Grocery & Cotton Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1924
- Smith v. New York, Ontario & Western RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1922
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. Palmer & Parker Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1932
- Crail v. Illinois Cent. R.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1927
- Husten v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
- Husten v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
- United States v. Palmer & Parker Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1932