Legal Opinion

Rimer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 31, 1966No. 18512PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Legge, Acting Justice.

State Farm Mutual Insurance Company, defendant in this action for damages, appeals from a circuit court order: (1) denying its motion to require the complaint to be made more definite and certain by separately stating matters contained therein which the defendant conceived as constituting separate causes of action; and (2) denying in part its motion to strike certain allegations from said complaint. By agreement of counsel time for answering the complaint was extended, pending final disposition of these motions.

This case is the aftermath of Layton v. Flowers, 243 S. C.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sams v. SamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1966
  2. Jh Ellen, Jr. v. KingSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1955
  3. J. M. S., Inc. v. TheoSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1962
  4. Layton v. FlowersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1964
  5. Tate v. BrazierSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1920

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Power Constructors, Inc. v. Taylor & HintzeAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Campus Sweater & Sportswear Co. v. M. B. Kahn Construction Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1979
  3. Hughes Ex Rel. Hughes v. Children's Clinic, P. A.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
  4. Save Charleston Foundation v. MurrayCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
  5. Curt's Trucking Co. v. City of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1978

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API