Legal Opinion

Layton v. Flowers

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 13, 1964No. 18153PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Brailseord, Justice.

This action for damages arose out oí an automobile collision caused by the negligence of one Flowers in the operation of a 1957 Chevrolet automobile. Flowers defaulted and appellant, a subsequent purchaser of the Chevrolet, intervened. He interposed the defense of bona fide purchaser for value withqut notice against the collision lien claimed by respondent under Sec. 45-551, Code of 1962. This plea was overruled by the trial court upon the authority of Tate v. Brazier, 115 S. C. 283, 105 S. E. 413. Appellant recognizes that this decision is athwart his contention that the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Powers v. PowersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1962
  2. Tate v. BrazierSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1920

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. McLeod v. StarnesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012
  2. Rimer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1966
  3. McLeod v. StarnesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012
  4. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic v. State of South CarolinaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2023
  5. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic v. State of South CarolinaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2023

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API