Legal Opinion
Cook v. James E. Griffith, Inc.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided August 22, 1963No. 3258PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOOD, Chief Judge.
Appellee, a corporation engaged in the plumbing business, sued to recover the value of plumbing work performed at the request of appellant who had contracted to make certain alterations in the home of a third party. It was established at trial that the plumbing work was done, that no claim was made that the work was defectively done, that the work passed official inspection, and that the amount sued for represented a fair and reasonable charge for the work. In the face of these established facts, appellant says it was error for the trial court to give judgment for appellee.
Ap…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rubin v. DouglasDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1948
- Holiday Homes, Inc. v. BrileyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1956
- City of New Rochelle v. BeckwithNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
- Kirschner v. KlavikDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1962
- City of St. Louis v. BenderSupreme Court of Missouri · 1913
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- William J. Davis, Inc. v. SladeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1970
- Capitol Hill Restoration Society v. Zoning CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
- Bathroom Design Institute v. ParkerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1974
- Saul v. Rowan Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Highpoint Townhouses, Inc. v. RappDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.