Legal Opinion
Bathroom Design Institute v. Parker
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided March 27, 1974No. 7297PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GALLAGHER, Associate Judge:
After trial in Superior Court the surety in this case was held to be liable on a home improvement contractor bond and on appeal this court is once again called upon to construe the Home Improvement Business Act 1 and the Home Improvement Licensing Regulations. 2 This case involves the extent of liability incurred by a surety when an unlicensed contractor it has bonded fails to perform under a home improvement contract.
On May 2, 1967, appellant Insurance Company of North America, Inc. (hereinafter INA) entered into a bond agreement whereby it agreed to act as surety…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Tcherepnin v. KnightSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Brown v. Southall Realty CompanyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1968
- William J. Davis, Inc. v. SladeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1970
- Gardner and North Roofing and Siding Corporation, a Corporation v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve SystemCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- Rubin v. DouglasDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1948
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Truitt v. MillerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Woodruff v. McConkeyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Ransburg v. HaaseAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
- Cevern, Inc. v. FerbishDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- Capital Construction Co. v. Plaza West Cooperative Ass'nDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.