Legal Opinion

Brady v. Industrial Commission

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 28, 1989No. 3—88—0461WCPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lewis

The claimant, Thomas Brady, claimed benefits under the Workers’ Compensation Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1987, ch. 48, par. 138.1 et seq.) (hereafter referred to as the Act) for injuries received while he was employed by the respondent Louis Ruffolo & Sons Construction Company. Following a hearing pursuant to section 19(b — 1) (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1987, ch. 48, par. 138.19(b—1)) of the Act, the arbitrator denied his claim, finding that he had failed to prove he had sustained accidental injuries arising out of his employment. In a split decision, the Illinois Industrial Commission (hereafter referred to…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. WuIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Scheffler Greenhouses, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Central Illinois Public Service Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Union Starch v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Material Service Corp. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1973

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brady v. Louis Ruffolo & Sons Construction Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Munn v. MUTUAL OF ENUMCLAW INSURANCECourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API