Legal Opinion

Meirowitz v. Bayport-Bluepoint Union Free School District

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 23, 2008PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*859The appeal from the intermediate order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entiy of judgment in the action (see Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248 [1976]). The issues raised on the appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the judgment (see CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).

In January 2001 the defendant Bayport-Bluepoint Union Free School District (hereinafter the School District) contracted with nonparty Horizon Benefits Administration, Inc. (hereinafter Horizon) to act as the third-party administrator of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. In re AhoNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Elmira Teachers' Ass'n v. Elmira City School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  4. Futterman v. West Shore Marina, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  5. Levy v. Morgan Brothers Manhattan Storage Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Civil Service Employees Ass'n v. Nassau Health Care Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  2. Civil Service Employees Ass'n v. Nassau Health Care Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  3. U.S. Philips Corp. v. EMI Music, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API