Legal Opinion
Szerlip v. Marcelle
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided November 14, 1955No. Civ. 11313PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRUCHHAUSEN, District Judge.
The plaintiff moved for leave to file an amended complaint. He claims that certain office furniture was seized by the defendant, Collector of Internal Revenue, under a warrant of distraint, for the tax liability of one Moss Industries, Inc., and sold pursuant to said warrant before plaintiff, an attorney, having an office in tax debtor’s plant, commenced this action by petition and order to show cause to stay the sale of such furniture, alleging that it was his property.
Upon the return day of the order to> show cause, the Court pointed out that it would be of no…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Raffaele v. Granger, Collector of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
- Tomlinson v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942
- Long v. RasmussenDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1922
- Rothensies v. UllmanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940
- Stuart v. Chinese Chamber of Commerce of PhoenixCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- First National Bank of Emlenton, Pennsylvania v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1959
- Sibyl Herrington v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
- Bullock v. LathamCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- Logan Planing Mill Co. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1962
- First National Bank of Emlenton, Pa. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1958
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.