Stuart v. Chinese Chamber of Commerce of Phoenix
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GARRECHT, Circuit Judge.
Appellees agree that the statement contained in appellant’s opening brief in general sets forth the facts, of this case in -a clear and concise manner. Those facts may be summarized as follows:
On or about the 11th day of October, 1945, one Ung Too Thet, alias Ung Kok Si, hereafter known -as “Thet” was arrested by .agents of the United States -Narcotics Bureau. A search of his premises by these agents resulted in the discovery of a safe containing some $32,000 in cash and checks which were “taken” as evidence by the narcotic agents "and “seized” by the Collector of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- George Moore Ice Cream Co. v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- United States v. KalesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Collector v. HubbardSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- City of Philadelphia v. the CollectorSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Shaw v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- First National Bank of Emlenton, Pennsylvania v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1959
- Busse v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
- Economy Plumbing & Heating Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
- Sibyl Herrington v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.