Legal Opinion
Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Young
District Court, N.D. Georgia
Decided February 12, 1990No. 1:89-CV-2200-RHHPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ROBERT H. HALL, District Judge.
Plaintiff brings this action to enforce a guaranty agreement executed by defendants. Jurisdiction is predicated upon 12 U.S.C. § 1819(b)(2)(A)1 and 28 U.S.C. § 1345. Currently before the court is defendants’ motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim. Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). For the reasons stated below, the court DENIES defendants’ motion to dismiss. FACTS
Plaintiff Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) is a corporation organized under the laws of the United States of America. 12 U.S.C. § 1811.
Defendants C.B.F. Young and Frances Young reside in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Goldman v. BeldenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- David C. Jackam and Susanne Jackam v. Hospital Corporation of America Mideast, Ltd. And Hospital Corporation of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
- Don L. PARR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WOODMEN OF THE WORLD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- 5th Bedford Pines Apartments, Ltd. v. BrandonDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2003