Legal Opinion
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Spector
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided April 16, 1982No. Misc. (BV) No. 16; Misc. (BV) No. 17PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
Once again we are involved in the unpleasant task of disciplining Maryland lawyers.
Bar Counsel, acting on behalf of the Attorney Grievance Commission, filed petitions with us seeking disciplinary action against Allen B. Spector and Maurice Roche Wyatt upon the basis of their convictions of bribery. They already stand suspended from the practice of law in this State until the further order of this Court. An order to that effect was entered pursuant to Maryland Rule BV16 subsequent to their convictions in the trial court. The facts are recounted in Spector v. State, 289 Md. 407, 425 A.2d 197,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Maryland State Bar Ass'n v. AgnewCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- United States v. Robert J. L'hoste, R. J. L'Hoste & Company, Inc., Clarence Eugene Rogers and Marvin Cochran, in Re United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. KahnCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- United States v. Keith L. ArthurCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1976
- Bar Ass'n of Balto. City v. SiegelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. NothsteinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. NorenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
- In re R.M.W.District Court, D. Maryland · 2007
- Reinstatement of CookeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
- In re the Reinstatement of WyattCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.