Legal Opinion

Ex parte Worden

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided December 19, 1973No. 47854PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROBERTS, Judge.

This is an appeal from a habeas corpus proceeding remanding the petitioner to custody for extradition to the State of Michigan.

The petitioner urges three contentions on this appeal. His first is that the record does not reflect that a judgment of conviction or sentence was presented to the Governor of this State as required by Art. 51.-13, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P. This contention is without merit. An examination of the Executive Warrant’s supporting papers, included with this record, reveals that an authenticated copy of the Michigan sentence is present.

Petitioner’s second…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ex Parte PrestonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1968
  2. Ex Parte SteelCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1950
  3. Ex Parte TineCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1968
  4. Ex Parte WilliamsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
  5. Ex Parte DumasCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Ex Parte BunchCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
  2. Echols v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
  3. Ex parte ParraCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  4. Ex Parte Jerome Wall, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2012
  5. Ex Parte Jerome Wall, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2012

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API