Legal Opinion

Ettner v. City of Medford

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 5, 2001No. 96-2123-L-3; A108631PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, J.

Plaintiff brought this unlawful employment practice claim against the City of Medford, alleging that the city unlawfully discharged her as a firefighter on the bases of gender and of perceived impairment. In a single proceeding, a jury found for the city on the perceived impairment claim, and the court found for plaintiff on the sex discrimination claim. The city appeals, and we affirm.

When the City of Medford hired Dave Bierwiler to be its fire chief in 1989, the Medford Fire Department employed no female firefighters, and one of Chief Bierwiler’s goals was to change that situation.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Winnett v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  3. State v. WatkinsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Miller v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  2. Wilmoth v. Ann Sacks Tile and Stone, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  3. Morrow v. Bard Access Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API