Legal Opinion
Petersen v. Rapid City, Pierre & Eastern Railroad, Inc.
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided October 30, 2024No. 5:22-cv-05064Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA WESTERN DIVISION KENNETH W. PETERSEN, JR., 5:22-CV-05064 Plaintiff, VS. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENNYING DEFENDANT’S RAPID CITY, PIERRE, & EASTERN MOTION FOR LEAVE TO TAKE A RAILROAD INC. A DELAWARE SUPPLEMENTAL DEPOSITION OF CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF Defendant. Pending before the Court is Defendant’s motion for leave to take a supplemental deposition of Plaintiff. (Doc. 160). Plaintiff has filed a response in opposition (Doc. 179). For the following reasons, the Court denies the motion to take a supplemental deposition. BACKGROUND The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gaylon Hofer v. Mack Trucks, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- Jeff Pavlik v. Cargill, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- Dixon v. Certainteed Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 1996
- Land O' Lakes, Inc. v. Employers Mutual Liability InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2012
- Perry v. Kelly-Springfield Tire Co.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.