Legal Opinion

Coulter v. Gough

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 1969No. 8588PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION NOBLE, Chief Justice.

Defendants, Mary Etta Killingsworth (now deceased), Mar Jo Smith Gough, and Union Oil Company of California, have appealed from a judgment quieting the title in plaintiffs to certain mineral interests in Lea County. The decree was a summary judgment based upon the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, admissions, affidavits and abstracts of title.

Plaintiffs’ claim to title to the minerals is based upon a tax deed and upon an earlier suit to quiet title. The defendants (appellants) trace their claim of ownership to mineral deeds from the patentee. Our…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Springer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Keely v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  3. Hood River County v. DabneyOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  4. De Treville v. SmallsSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  5. Straus v. FoxworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1913

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ernest W. Hahn, Inc. v. County AssessorNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Matter of Protest of MillerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Register v. Kenai Peninsula BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State Ex Rel. Bell v. HANSEN LUMBER COMPANY, INC.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Hoffman v. STATE, TAXATION & REV. DEPT.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API