Legal Opinion

Whiteman v. City of San Diego

California Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 1920No. L. A. No. 5145PublishedCited by 5 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtWilbur, J.

This is an action to quiet title of plaintiff to certain property against certain liens for the improvement of Ohio Street, and also to enjoin the issuance of bonds for such assessments made upon plaintiff’s adjoining land for the improvement of said street. Both parties state that the question before this court is whether that portion of Ohio Street running through the property of the plaintiff is or is not a public street. In 1888 a map was filed by the contestants of plaintiff’s predecessor, whereon Ohio Street was shown as now claimed by the city. The plaintiff’s predecessor was not a…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Root v. WoolworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Schwerdtle v. County of PlacerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Niles v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Allen v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Thomson v. WeismanTexas Supreme Court · 1904

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gion v. City of Santa CruzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. People v. SayigCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  3. Laguna Beach v. Consolidated Mortgage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1945
  4. County of Los Angeles v. BerkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  5. County of Los Angeles v. BerkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API