Legal Opinion · Dissent

County of Los Angeles v. Berk

California Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1980No. L.A. 31099Published

1DissentClark, J.

I dissent.

Gion-Dietz (Gion v. City of Santa Cruz (1970) 2 Cal.3d 29 [84 Cal.Rptr. 162, 465 P.2d 50]) declared substantial law without adequate discussion, repudiated settled principles applicable to claims of dedication by adverse use, ignored constitutional guarantees of property *225rights, established an inequitable doctrine punishing the unselfish, and promulgated a rule counterproductive to the policy sought to be served. The Legislature repudiated Gion-Dietz in large part. We should acknowledge the court’s mistake and overrule the case.

Prior to Gion-Dietz no case held dedication of an…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Archer v. Salinas CityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. O'BANION v. BorbaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Gion v. City of Santa CruzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Union Transportation Co. v. Sacramento CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Slavich v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API