Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Bowers v. Taft

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided July 5, 1927No. 280, 294Published

1ConcurrenceL. Hand, Circuit Judge

In each of these cases the amount of the tax does not exceed the increase in value of the gift while in the donee’s hands. Strictly speaking, the question does not therefore arise whether Congress may, as a tax on income, seize any part of the increase in value of the gift before the donee accepted it. I am not entirely sure that a tax, if limited to the increase in the donee’s hands, might not be calculated upon the difference between what the donor paid and the donee got. At the argument, I was disposed to think that these cases might be decided on some such reasoning, but it is pretty…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Eisner v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Eisner, Internal Revenue Collector v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  3. Lynch v. TurrishSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  4. Gray v. DarlingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  5. People ex rel. Brewster v. WendellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API