Johnson v. State

PER CURIAM,

The appellant was charged with murder in the first degree, convicted of murder in the second degree, and sentenced to twenty years imprisonment.

When the State rested its case the appellant moved to exclude the testimony and discharge the defendant on grounds “it is so permeated with leading questions that it is prejudicial.” The court overruled the motion and the appellant reserved an exception.

We have carefully considered the testimony offered by the State and are of the opinion that the court did not abuse its discretion in allowing leading questions and there was no error in…