Legal Opinion

Timken Roller Bearing Co. v. Pennsylvania Railroad

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 18, 1927No. 168, 178PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Taft

These two cases are exactly alike, and the same disposition will be made of them. They were dismissed at this term for lack of-jurisdiction, as follows:

“ Dismissed for lack of jurisdiction in this Court on the authority of Transportes Maritimes Do Estado v. Almeida, 265 U. S. 104, 105, and Oliver American Trading Company v. Government of the United States of Mexico, 264 U. S. 440, 442."

This is a motion, to set aside the dismissals and to substitute therefor orders transferring them to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.

The Timken Roller Bearing Company is a corporation of Ohio…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Great Northern Railway Co. v. Merchants Elevator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Smith v. AppleSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Oliver American Trading Co. v. Government of United States of MexicoSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. Transportes Maritimos Do Estado v. AlmeidaSupreme Court of the United States · 1924

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Swift & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Becker Steel Co. of America v. CummingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Broome v. Hardie-Tynes Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937
  4. Morgenthau v. Sugar Land Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1936
  5. Becker Steel Co. of America v. CummingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API