Frank v. Hollerith
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtGarrett, Presiding Judge
This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Interference Examiners of the United States Patent Office holding that appellant, because of lack of disclosure, is not entitled to make the count involved in an interference proceeding, and awarding priority to appellee.
The decision of the board states that the wheel structure described in the count is “particularly intended for airplane use.”
The count reads:
1. In combination with a wheel, an axle therefor and a support for maintaining said axle against rotation, bearings adjacent the ends of said wheel for supporting said wheel on said…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Wheeler v. KleinschmidtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1945
3Cited by2 opinions
- Application of Oliver Kenneth KelleyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
- Saklatwalla v. MarburgCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1949