Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

United States v. Adcock

United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided April 27, 2006No. ACM 36018Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partMathews, Judge

This case presents the question: Must the government obey its own laws? Today, regrettably, a majority of this Court concludes it need not.

We write separately to dissent from the majority’s conclusion that military officials at Travis AFB acted reasonably and within the scope of their discretion when they ordered the appellant confined under conditions that violated the regulations of the Secretary of the Air Force and executive orders of the President of the United States. We do not believe that a Presidential order mandating compliance with service regulations should be interpreted to…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Service v. DullesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Vitarelli v. SeatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. American Farm Lines v. Black Ball Freight ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Frances Kern v. Txo Production CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
  5. United States v. RussoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API