Legal Opinion

Riverton Valley Drainage Dist. v. Board of County Com'rs.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1937No. 2060PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Blume, Chief Justice.

This action was brought by the Riverton Valley Drainage District, plaintiff, against the Board of County Commissioners of Fremont County and its Treasurer, to recover the sum of $2199.16 on account of penalty and interest collected on drainage taxes of the plaintiff district. It is agreed that that sum was in fact collected and was paid into the general fund of the county. The court found for plaintiff, entering a general judgment in its favor for $858.90, and directed that the sum of $1340.26 be paid into its bond and interest fund. From that judgment the defendants have…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Police Commissioners v. County CourtSupreme Court of Missouri · 1864
  2. Salt Creek Transp. Co. v. Public Service CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Taxpayers' League of Carbon County v. McPhersonWyoming Supreme Court · 1936
  4. City of Fremont v. Dodge CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1936
  5. People ex rel. City of Springfield v. PowerIllinois Supreme Court · 1860

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Lockyer v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Albrethsen v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1939
  3. State Ex Rel. Nielson v. City of GoodingIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Board of County Commissioners v. Laramie County School District No. OneWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Hanson v. Town of GreybullWyoming Supreme Court · 1947

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API