Larry Hope v. Mark Pelzer, Gene McClaran
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BIRCH, Circuit Judge:
In this ease, we decide whether an inmate’s Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment rights were violated when prison guards handcuffed him to a hitching post on two occasions, one of which lasted for seven hours without regular water or bath room breaks. The district court granted summary judgment for the defendant prison guards because they were entitled to qualified immunity. We AFFIRM.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiff-Appellant Larry Hope was an inmate at Limestone Correctional Facility (“Limestone”) in 1995, where he was assigned to the chain gang. On two occasions, Hope was transported…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Rhodes v. ChapmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Hope v. PelzerSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Thomas v. BryantCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
- Danley v. AllenCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
- Antonio Smith v. John KindCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2025
- Hope v. PelzerSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.