Canter v. Mulnick
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed with costs.
The Appellate Division correctly held that the plaintiffs’ affidavit failed to establish the merit of their case, and that the motion to dismiss should have been granted unconditionally (see Stolowitz u Mount Sinai Hosp., 60 NY2d 685).
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer and Simons concur.
On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Stolowitz v. Mount Sinai HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
3Cited by43 opinions
- Stukas v. StreiterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Fiore v. GalangNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Kel Management Corp. v. Rogers & WellsNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Amsler v. VerrilliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- County of Nassau v. Cedric Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.