Ceramica Regiomontana, S.A. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
Background
Musgrave, Judge:
In a complaint filed at the outset of this action, plaintiff challenges several aspects of a final administrative review by the Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) of an outstanding affirmative countervailing duty determination and order covering imports into *707the United States of ceramic tile from Mexico. 1 Plaintiff now moves for leave to amend its complaint by adding a challenge of the methodology used by Commerce to calculate a country-wide countervailing duty assessment rate applicable to imports of the subject merchandise into this country by the plaintiff…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Hormel v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. L. A. Tucker Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Alhambra Foundry Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
- Timken Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.