Legal Opinion

City Bank & Trust Co. v. Leightner

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 9, 1976No. Docket No. 22252PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtT. M. Burns, J.

By this action, plaintiff, as executor of the estate of Esther Dunlap, sought to recover the contents of a safe deposit box, which contents were given to defendant after Mrs. Dunlap’s death.

After evidence was presented, both parties moved for a directed verdict. The motions being denied, the case went to the jury, which found for defendant. The trial court denied plaintiff’s motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and for a new trial, and plaintiff now appeals as of right.

Decedent leased a safe deposit box at the Na*249tional Bank of Jackson. Defendant, Mrs. Dunlap’s only child, was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Isom v. FarrugiaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. In Re Peterson's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Lilly v. SchmockMichigan Supreme Court · 1941

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Duggan v. KetoDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Finkelstein v. KissellColorado Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. In Re Estate of FinkelsteinColorado Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. In Re Dunlap EstateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. in Re Huhta EstateMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API