Harris v. Van Hoose
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtH. Brown, J.
Appellants contend that R.C. 4115.10(C) authorizes them to assert prevailing wage claims on behalf of workers who have not brought suit in their own names pursuant to R.C. 4115.10(A) and who have not assigned their claims to the Department of Industrial Relations pursuant to R.C. 4115.10(B). For the reasons which follow, we agree and reverse the judgment of the court below.
The dispute between the parties focuses on R.C. 4115.10(C), which provides in pertinent part:
“If after investigation * * * the director determines there is a violation of * * * [the prevailing wage provisions of R.C.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State ex rel. Evans v. MooreOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- Cochrel v. RobinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1925
- State ex rel. Harris v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. TipkaOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Personal Service Insurance v. MamoneOhio Supreme Court · 1986
3Cited by27 opinions
- Wolfe v. WolfeOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- State ex rel. Toledo Edison Co. v. City of ClydeOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. v. LynchOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- State ex rel. National Electrical Contractors Ass'n v. Ohio Bureau of Employment ServicesOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- State ex rel. Natl. Electrical Contractors Assn., Ohio Conference v. Ohio Bur. of Emp. Serv.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.