Legal Opinion
City of Columbus v. Thompson
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided February 3, 1971No. 70-334PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCorrigan, J.
This cause squarely brings into question the constitutional validity of a portion of the “suspicious *28person” ordinance of the city of Columbus. That ordinance, Section 2387.02, as in question here, reads, in part:
“It shall be unlawful for any suspicious person to be in this city. The following shall be deemed suspicious persons:
i C # # #
“(g) Any person who wanders about the streets or other public ways or who is found abroad at late or unusual hours in the night without any visible or lawful business and who does not give satisfactory account of himself.”
Appellant attacks this provision of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Winters v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Giaccio v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Alegata v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
- Commonwealth v. CarpenterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
3Cited by34 opinions
- State v. TannerOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. CollierOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. BurnettOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. YoungOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. YoungOhio Supreme Court · 1980
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.