Legal Opinion
Hosley v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided February 24, 1987No. C3-86-1429Published
1Opinion of the Court
401 N.W.2d 136 (1987)
Patrick HOSLEY, et al., Appellants,
v.
PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION, Respondent.
No. C3-86-1429.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota.
February 24, 1987.
Review Denied April 23, 1987.
Richard LaVerdiere, Hastings, for appellants.
Patrick T. Tierney, Eugene D. Buckley, St. Paul, for respondent.
Heard, considered and decided by CRIPPEN, P.J., and LANSING and NIERENGARTEN, JJ.
OPINION
CRIPPEN, Judge.
This appeal comes to us following an initial appeal to this court and the Minnesota Supreme Court, and a remand to the trial court. Both parties appeal the trial court's determination that a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Frey Ex Rel. Frey v. SnelgroveSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Connar v. West Shore Equipment of Milwaukee, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- Lines v. RyanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Hosley v. Armstrong Cork Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Hosley v. Armstrong Cork Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.