Legal Opinion

Plunkett v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 6, 1936No. 4-4353PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

The Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (hereinafter referred to as appellee) issued to Vernon E. Manning’s employer certain group policies of insurance, pursuant to which certificates were issued to Manning and other employees, affording them certain specified insurance protection under the group policies. These certificates recite that they were issued under and pursuant to the terms and provisions of the group or master policies and were referable to those policies for the determination of the insurance coverage.

Manning brought this suit, which, after his death, was revived in the name of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bergholm v. Peoria Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Ginell v. . the Prudential Insurance Company of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  3. Ginell v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
  4. Sovereign Camp Woodmen of the World v. MeekSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
  5. Ginell v. Prudential InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1922

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. New England Mutual Life Insurance v. HurstCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API