Legal Opinion

PRIME ENERGY AND CHEMICAL, LLC v. TUCKER ARENSBERG, P.C.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 1, 2022No. 2:18-cv-00345Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA PRIME ENERGY AND CHEMICAL, LLC, ) Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 18-345 ) Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly . Re: ECF No. 173 TUCKER ARENSBERG, P.C., and ) MICHAEL A. SHINER, ) Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER KELLY, Magistrate Judge Presently before the Court is the “Motion to Preclude Proffered Expert Report and Testimony of Defendant’s Expert Robert Wilkinson and to Order Production of Item 13 Considered in the Report” filed by Plaintiff Prime Energy and Chemical, LLC (“Plaintiff’ or “Prime Energy’). ECF No.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. In Re Paoli Railroad Yard PCB LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  4. Gibbs v. ErnstSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Pineda v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API