Freeman v. Wilkinson

Appellant’s first argument is that it was substantial error for the court of appeals to deny his motion for “notice for hearing and motion to revise and for judgment N.O.V.” On appeal, he cites Civ.R. 54(B). In the actual motion, he cited Civ.R. (7)(B) and 50(B), as well as Civ.R. 54(B). None of these rules have application to this case. Civ.R. 7(B)(2) provides that:

*309“To expedite its business, the court may make provision by rule or order for the submission and determination of motions without oral hearing upon brief written statements of reasons in support and opposition.”

Appellant provided a…