State ex rel. Freeman v. Wilkinson

On appeal, appellant does not attack the judgment directly but raises four procedural issues. For the following reasons, we reject appellant’s claims.

Appellant first argues that the court of appeals violated Civ.R. 54(B) by deciding fewer than all his claims without an express finding that there is no just cause for delay. However, the record indicates that the court decided all his claims. Therefore, appellant’s first proposition of law is without merit.

Next, appellant argues that he should have been granted a peremptory writ of mandamus since there was no answer filed. However, the court of…