Legal Opinion

In Re Anderson

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided March 2, 1926PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CANT, District Judge.

In this proceeding one of the creditors holds a mortgage on the homestead of the bankrupt as security for his claim. In connection therewith, the question is whether section 57h of the Bankruptcy Act (Comp. St. § 9641) applies. That section and subdivision relate to secured creditors only, but do not define that term. The definition is found in section 1 (23) of the act (Comp. St. § 9585). The language employed in such definition, so far as here material, reads as follows:

‘Secured creditor’ shall include a creditor who has security for his debt upon the property of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re BaileyDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1910
  2. In re MeredithDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1906
  3. Gregory Co. v. BristolCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1911
  4. In re CaleDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1910
  5. In re LantzenheimerDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1903

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Robinson v. EXCHANGE NAT. BANK OF TULSA, OKL.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1939
  2. I. H. Kent Company and First National Bank of Nevada v. Harry A. Busscher, Trustee in Bankruptcy of the Estate of Boyce H. MillerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1960
  3. In re CainDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1968
  4. In re GuilliotDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API