Legal Opinion

B. L. Schrader, Inc. v. Anderson Lumber Co.

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided August 30, 1966No. Civ. No. 16014PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMSEN, Chief Judge.

At a pretrial conference in this case, which was held before the amendments to the Civil Rules which became effective on July 1, 1966, defendant (Anderson) contended that third-party defendant (Charshee) was a partner of plaintiff (Schrader) or a joint venturer with plaintiff, and, in either event, should be treated as an indispensable party plaintiff and realigned as such. Since both Anderson and Charshee are citizens of Maryland, this would destroy the diversity jurisdiction, which would otherwise exist because Schrader is a citizen of the State of Washington. The…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Levering & Garrigues Co. v. MorrinSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Great Southern Fire Proof Hotel Company v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  3. Levering & Garrigues Co. v. MorrinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
  4. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co. v. HugeeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1940
  5. Taylor v. BrindleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1947

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ethan Dairy Products v. AustinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Cass v. Sonnenblick-Goldman Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1968
  3. Parsons, Brinckerhoff, Quade & Douglas, Inc. v. Palmetto Bridge ConstructorsDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API