Legal Opinion

Michael Singleton v. AT&T Enterprises, Illinois Bell Telephone Company, LLC, and AT&T Incorporated

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided November 18, 2025No. 1:24-cv-12485Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION MICHAEL SINGLETON, Plaintiff, Case No. 1:24-cv-12485 v. Judge Mary M. Rowland AT&T ENTERPRISES, ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, LLC, and AT&T INCORPORATED, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Michael Singleton (“Plaintiff’) brings this action against Illinois Bell Telephone Company, LLC (“Illinois Bell”), AT&T Enterprises, and AT&T Incorporated (“AT&T Inc.”) (collectively, “Defendants”) alleging violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq. (“Title VII”) and…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Tamayo v. BlagojevichCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  4. Brewster McCauley v. City of ChicagCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  5. Patrick Camasta v. Jos. A. Bank Clothiers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API