Newell v. Newell
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
HOLT, Justice.
The action is for a limited divorce. Shortly after its commencement plaintiff moved for temporary alimony, attorney’s fees, and suit money, and an order was made on February 4, 1932. The order provided that during the pendency of the action certain payments should be made to plaintiff for temporary alimony, suit money, and attorney’s fees. It also contained a paragraph ordering the husband to pay upon the mortgage on his homestead and to pay the amounts called for in the contract for the purchase of the homestead. Defendant had bought, on contract, an expensive and encumbered…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bushman v. BushmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1929
- Bensel v. HallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- Goldfish v. GoldfishAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
- Weiss v. WeissAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
- Bressette v. BressetteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Zieman v. ZiemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963