Legal Opinion
United States v. 29.16 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, ETC.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 15, 1980No. Civ. A. 78-3364PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LUONGO, District Judge.
The United States of America commenced this action to take by its power of eminent domain certain parcels of land adjoining the Valley Forge National Historical Park. The motion currently before me involves the question of who holds title to one of these parcels.
The parcel in dispute consists of .68 of an acre, on which is erected a single-family residence. The record owners are Fred A. and Ruth E. Midgley. When it filed this action the government also named David and Barbara Wells as interested parties, because of information it had that they had entered into a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Meehan v. Cheltenham TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Walker v. SaricksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Bogojavlensky v. LoganSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Globe Motors, Inc. v. Studebaker-Packard CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964
- Pellegrene v. LutherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Temp-Way Corp. v. Continental BankDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
- Hostetter v. HooverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Green v. Interstate United Management Services Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Downingtown Industrial & Agricultural School v. Pa. Dept. of Education (In Re Downingtown Industrial & Agricultural School)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
- GE Capital Mortgage Services, Inc. v. Pinnacle Mortgage Investment Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.