Professional Business Systems, Inc. v. Kaufman
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
MADDOX, Justice.
This case involves the interpretation of a contract; the critical issue is whether parol evidence should be admitted in order to determine the overall intent of the parties.
The plaintiffs, Daniel and Marilyn Kaufman, were employed as computer data processors by Professional Business Systems and by A.F. Austin & Associates (hereinafter “AFA”); both corporations were founded by Mr. A.F. Austin (hereinafter “Austin”). Austin’s two companies suffered through financial difficulties from the time they were formed. As a result, AFA was unable to pay the Kaufmans their full 1980…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Elder v. EI DuPont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1985
- Alpine Construction Co. v. Water Works Board of the City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
- Coosa Valley Youth Services v. Etowah CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
3Cited by3 opinions
- Marriott Intern., Inc. v. deCELLESupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
- Anderson Bros. Chrysler Plymouth Dodge, Inc. v. HadleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
- Industrial Development Board v. RussellSupreme Court of Alabama · 2013