Legal Opinion
In re Goldman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 11, 2005PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Respondent Michael L. Goldman was admitted to the practice of law by the Second Judicial Department on November 15., 1978. Until his suspension by order of this Court entered May 18, 2004, at all times relevant to this proceeding, respondent maintained an office for the practice of law within the First Judicial Department (7 AD3d 18 [2004]).
Respondent’s suspension was based on his wilful failure to cooperate with the Committee in its investigation of allegations of professional misconduct. Specifically, this Court held that respondent “repeatedly thwarted the Committee’s…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- In re GillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re GoldmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re HubbertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
4Cited by5 opinions
- In re BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In re VeskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- In re StreitAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Matter of SampsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Goldman v. RioNew York Supreme Court · 2008