Legal Opinion
Goldman v. Rio
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 28, 2008PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Leonard B. Austin, J.
Defendants, Richard R. Rio (Richard) and Law Offices of Richard R. Rio, PLLC (Rio PLLC), move to dismiss this action pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (3) and (5).
Plaintiff, Michael Goldman, cross-moves for summary judgment on his cause of action to compel an accounting and to compel defendants to comply with his discovery demands.
Background
In 1982, Goldman and Richard formed a partnership for the practice of law known as Goldman & Rio, Esqs. (G & R). They practiced law as G & R until May 18, 2004 when Goldman was suspended from the practice of law. (Matter of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Dynamics Corp. of America v. Marine Midland Bank-New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Environmental Concern, Inc. v. Larchwood Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Colonial Funding Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Quiros v. PolowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Decolator, Cohen & DiPrisco, LLP v. Lysaght, Lysaght & Kramer, P.C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Goldman v. RioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009