Legal Opinion
Rosano v. United States
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided September 20, 1999No. 9:97-cv-05361PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT & RECOMMENDATION
SEYBERT, District Judge.
Pending before the Court are the objections of both plaintiff and defendant to the July 29, 1999 Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Michael L. Orenstein regarding the defendant’s motion for summary judgment in this action for recovery of estate taxes. Magistrate Judge Oren-stein, in a thorough and well-reasoned report, recommended to this Court that the defendant's motion be granted in part and denied in part.
Defendant timely filed what it termed its “Acknowledgment of Mootness Regarding One Issue, and Objection With…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Carol A. Gallo v. Prudential Residential Services, Limited Partnership, Doing Business as Prudential Relocation ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Carole Tomka v. The Seiler Corporation, Daniel Lucey, David Polonsky and Timothy ConroyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Robert Rosano, as of the Estate of Mary R. Rosano v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- United States v. AllisonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022