People v. Pickett
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
While the jury was being polled one juror, when asked whether the verdicts were hers, responded, “Yes, under duress, I’m saying yes”. The Trial Judge then asked her, “Are they your verdicts, yes or no?”, to which the juror replied, “Yes.” Defense counsel thereupon requested the court to hold a hearing to make a determination as to what the stated duress consisted of. We agree with the Appellate Division that the denial of this request was error.
In light of the juror’s reference to “duress”, the trial court…
2Cited by41 opinions
- People v. CainNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Sharrow v. Dick Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
- People v. TestaNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- People v. ReddAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- People v. BookerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.